References and Notes
[1] The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications
Board (CSTB), Executive summary.
[2] I define the process of creative work
as the sum of an individuals intellectual efforts
in a particular endeavour. For example, the creative work which
resulted in an initial manuscript for a book would include the
creative thoughts and ideas in the authors mind and all
his or her research, writing and editing.
[3] Creator/Author - Throughout this
paper I often assume that the owner of the copyright of an intellectual
product is the creator or author of the intellectual property
therefore when I talk of the creator I imply the legal
copyright holder or content owner. The fact that the rights holder
might have bought the right from the original creator makes no
difference to my arguments here.
[4] Intangible - incapable of being touched,
Websters
[5] Book - Throughout this paper I use
the printed book as an example of a copyrighted product to illustrate
how the traditional copyright process works or is implemented.
The copyrighted book is easy to imagine but the same arguments
apply to other forms of copyrightable material such as vinyl records,
tapes, CDs, Etc.
[6] Story - As in the book
example (see note above), I use the term
story as a simple term to represent the creative intellectual
idea and expression behind the intellectual product.
[7] Consumers - Throughout this paper
I refer to consumers and users of intellectual products. For the
purpose of this discussion, each term refers equally to an individual
or organization which is making use the intellectual product.
[9] The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications
Board (CSTB), Executive summary.
[10] Multuple Copies - In active computer
systems and networks the product is being continuously copied
from one electronic storage device or memory to the next. This
problem is well recognised:-
In
the digital world, even the most routine access to information
invariably involves making a copy: Computer programs are run by
copying them from disk to memory, for example (an act that some
courts have ruled to be "copying" for the purposes of
copyright law), and Web pages are viewed by copying them from
a remote computer to the local machine
, for digital information, access is copying. The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB),
Executive summary
[12] Efficiency is an economic term used
to describe the economic cost of distributing information, it
reflects the social benefit of widely spread ideas and it is usually
balanced against the costs of implementing and enforcing a property
rights regime to encourage creative effort.
[13] Increased social welfare costs reduce
the number of ideas available to future authors.
[14] In a globally
networked world there will always be people who can decrypt content-
protection measures and share their bounty with others. The real
risk is that if media companies make the customer experience too
onerous, it will push more and more otherwise law-abiding people
to break the law merely in order to get the conveniences they
see to be their right. People who would be willing to pay for
their music will have no simple way to do so. - Tuning
Out the Customer, Fortune.com, Tuesday, October 8, 2002, By David Kirkpatrick
-and -
Distribution
without the right to save and/or print would create a world in
which information may be distributed but never easily shared.
Some committee members believe that if copyright is truly to be
a pact between society and authors to encourage the creation and
dissemination of information for society's ultimate benefit, highly
constrained models of distribution call this pact into question.
The Digital
Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information Age (2000),Computer
Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB), Executive summary
-and
"
...and that encryption technologies make no distinctions between
fair and unfair uses." Para. 3.6 The Internet
as a threat and a challenge, Study
on Intellectual Property Rights, the Internet, and Copyright,
By: Alan Story for the UK Commission on Intellectual Property
Rights. Alan Story is Lecturer in Intellectual Property Kent Law School, University of Kent.
[15] Individuals in their daily lives have
the capability and the opportunity to access and copy vast amounts
of digital information, yet lack a clear picture of what is acceptable
or legal. The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications
Board (CSTB), Executive summary, page 4.
[17] To read is not a fair use; its
an unregulated use Lawrence Lessigs
address to the Open Source Convention, 24 July, 2002. Lawrence
Lessig is professor of law at Stanford University.
[18]
The term
Collective Rights as use here refers to the
rights of a group which have collective access to an intangible
intellectual product and should not be confused with the term
collective work which is often used to define a work
consisting of a number of contributions consisting of independent
works.
[19] Nor is it easy to supply
a clear, "bright-line" answer [to what is acceptable
or legal], because (among other things) current intellectual property
law is complex. - and - Laws
that are simple, clear, and comprehensible are needed, particularly
those parts of the IP law that are most directly relevant to consumer
behavior in daily life. - The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000), CSTB, Executive summary, page 4.
[20] Easier - Quicker, cheaper, no forms,
no shops, the thing to do, instant gratification
[21] The Handle
System technology, developed by the CNRI, provides a global
name service for digital objects.
[24] The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000), Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB),
Executive summary.
[25] John Barton - As reported in
Patently Problematic, By David Sarnoff, Economist.com.
[26] In a separate analysis of digital products
as memes in an evolutionary system
I show how the DIPR system imposes few penalties on identified
products compared to unidentified products.
[28] Others have established the need for greater
public understanding of the principles of current copyright
law and the same arguments would apply to the DIPR system.
Copyright Education, The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB),
Executive summary
[29] Many others have argued that creators and
their media agents should see the digital revolution as an opportunity
not a threat (DIPR would provide the structure and opportunity).
For example:
Says
Jerry Michalski: "Because media companies see intellectual
property as their only asset, they're willing to risk totally
alienating their entire customer base in order to protect that
asset." He says that instead the companies should learn to
view their [the] customers themselves as the asset and figure
out ways to partner with them, or treat them as what he calls
"co-participants, rather than an inert audience that merely
consumes media."
Tuning
Out the Customer, Fortune.com,
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, By David Kirkpatrick.
[30] The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications
Board (CSTB), Executive summary.
[31] The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB),
Executive summary
.
[32] http://sims.berkeley.edu/~fredrik/research/papers/EvaluatingDRM.html
[33] 'Public Good - Economists
sometimes refer to certain goods as public.
This does not imply that they are in the public domain as defined
by intellectual property law. Rather, a public good is a product
or service that has two properties. First, it is non-rival,
which simply means that consumption by one person doesnt
limit consumption of the next. Second, it is non-excludable, implying that once the product exists,
the benefit cannot be limited to those that have paid for it.'
- A
Framework for Evaluating Digital Rights Management Proposals,
by Rachna Dhamija and Fredrik Wallenberg,
[34] The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB),
Executive summary
[36] Given the challenges to the copyright
regime posed by digital information, the committee concluded that
alternatives to a copy-based model for protection of digital information
deserve consideration,
. - The
Digital Dilemma: Intellectual Property in the Information
Age (2000),Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB),
Executive summary
[37]
Memes - In this discussion
I relate Memes to a creative piece of
work or intellectual property. Any one meme could have many different manifestations and there can
be multiple copies of any particular manifestation especially
when we are considering digital manifestations. See: The Selfish
Gene, Oxford University Press 1976, ISBN 0-19-286092-5, Memes Page 192 by Richard Dawkins for the original
definition. Or, Meme
Central
[42] http://sims.berkeley.edu/~fredrik/research/papers/EvaluatingDRM.html
[43] ECMS - Electronic Copyright Management System - By ECMS I mean systems
where rights holders manage the rights they hold and grant to
other users of the product. This should not be confused with Digital
Rights Management (DRM) that tries to enforce end-to-end control
of the use of a digital product.
|